Monday, July 2, 2012

Changing "The Game"



In the middle of this year’s season of “The Game”, a former college and current indoor football quarterback tweeted “I love The Game. This show is the closest I’ve seen to how it really is in sports”.  Since I am not a former football player, I cannot dispute his claim about “The Game”.  My concern about his tweet is that, if the BET television series “The Game” is an accurate representation of life situations that occur in the world of sports, or at least football, I have much more to worry about than the academic success of Black male athletes. 

I have been a strong supporter of The Game since its first show aired over 6 years ago.  I was excited to see a show that finally depicts the experiences of Black athletes.  My expectations were low, in terms of whether or not the depiction would be “accurate” but high with hopes that it would offer a positive representation of Black male athletes and their families.  I could speak at length about the many theoretical challenges I have had with the show over these six years, but I chose to focus this blog on Season 5.   

I believe that this series is at a crossroads or has already hit a dead end.  Season 5 ends  with an exit of the main characters Derwin Davis (Pooch Hall) and Melanie Davis (Tia Mowry), a happy ending for Jason Pitts (Coby Bell) and Tasha Mack (Wendy Raquel Robinson), and a heart broken Malik Wright (Hosea Chanchez).  This season has been most compelling for me because of the hype surrounding the start of the season and directorial choices that were made upon its return.  Most notably, the show previously aired on the WB but was cancelled after Season 4.  After a public outcry over the shows cancellation, BET made the decision to air reruns and the 5th season.  However, due to the change, the show took a two year hiatus before re-airing.  The season premiere was heavily publicized and resulted in the show registering millions of viewers, possibly the highest rated show of the BET network.  Despite the enthusiasm of its return, many of the people who know I am a fan of the show told me that they were immediately turned off and did not plan to continue watching.   This included my mother who could not understand how her socially conscious daughter could be in support of a show that in its season opener showed a white woman chastising a black woman for being jealous of her whiteness.  Unfortunately, my attempt to explain my past support of the show even sounded weak to me after watching the first episode of the season.  However, I was determined to believe that the direction of the show would all be understood, if I just gave it a chance.     




Please bear with me as I speak at length about Melanie and Derwin.  They are (were) the main characters of the show but will not be returning for the 6th season.  I feel as though this warrants a lengthy commentary.

When Tia Mowry tweeted that she would not be returning for Season 6 of The Game, I did not immediately accept it until Pooch Hall followed with a tweet that he also would not be returning.  For fans of the game, Derwin and Melanie’s relationship was the cornerstone of our support.  True to most relationships, their life choices always created the perfect dramatic (sometimes overly dramatic) story keeping viewers in constant question of whether or not they would ever “get it right” or “have a happy ending”.  If there was one thing you could count on with Melanie and Derwin, it was that something bad was going to happen at the end of each season but their love would always prevail by the beginning of the next.  Often, I was personally annoyed, by a constant representation of this black woman who “chose” a football wife lifestyle by dropping out of medical school to travel to San Diego with her then boyfriend, eventual husband but never seemed satisfied in the choice she had made.  Ironically, not only would the director stay true to her story line but would be the eventual reason or explanation for their season ending departure.  As a successful black female, I was always concerned about this depiction of another black woman who could not be satisfied with the success of her man and choosing her personal goals over her family.  Because I have never done an empirical study on whether or not this consistent message is a fact, of not just Black women but often professional women in general, I cannot dispute the claims.  My personal opinion is that a women’s life choices are far more complicated than those depicted on the show and more often than not a women will figure out a way to not only make her dreams come true but support her man along the way.  Why?  Because we are superwomen and have the audacity to believe that you really can have it all.  Though seemingly destructive, the most positive message these characters sent was that true love conquers all.  It took Derwin 5 seasons to agree with Melaine’s claim that her previous sacrifices warranted a consideration to put her needs first, for once.  Hopefully, this will be how people remember their relationship most.  That love is about negotiations and compromises!   


One of the most challenging things to support this season was the significant shifts in blatantly racist and sexist dialogue.  While season after season, Kelly (Brittany Daniel) and Tasha (Wendy Robinson) would trade black girl vs. white girl comments, never before were they as demeaning to black women as this season.  I would like to believe that this overemphasis was to draw more attention to the Tasha Mack, successful but insecure story line.  Overall, I would like to challenge the writers to be more creative in sending this message.  Many of the comments were unnecessary, offensive, and perpetuated the “angry/bitter black women” narrative.  I am neither angry nor bitter and neither are any of the Black women I know.  The self-esteem and relationship issues that Black women have is a very serious issue.  They should be addressed in a more comprehensive and less stereotypical manner.      
           
The most surprising shift to most was the introduction of the character, Chardonnay Jenkins (Brandy Norwood).  It was not a surprise that the show would add a character that could compliment the popular “ghettoized” Tasha Mack personality, but that she would not be paired with Tasha Mack at all.  In fact, she was written into the script to become the new love interest of Jason Pitts (Coby Bell), who for 4 seasons was not only married to a white women but consistently argued against ever dating a black women, specifically for all the reasons Chardonnay was an odd love connection for him.  Interestingly, the writers chose to bring the two together by a “drunken” Mexican marriage as if the only way a black man can learn to see past his stereotypical ideas about black women is by accident.  In the end, not only does Chardonnay totally alter Jason’s perception of black people, she helps him to accept his own blackness.  More significantly, the financial constraints he put on his white wife which caused their eventual divorce, would be the thing that would develop a partnership between he and his new black wife.  The reason this is not so difficult for me to accept however, is because Coby Bell has been happily married to his real life black wife for years in which they have four children together.  We could of course go into a lengthy discussion of the inaccurate perception that Black athletes only marry white women, but we can save that for another blog.      

           Last but certainly not least is the infamous Malik Wright.  Season after season we watched his constant battle with trying to love a black woman only to be hurt/betrayed by their love which results in promoting his promiscuous and alcohol additive behavior.  I could dispute this storyline choice, but I will simply save that for hopefully more seasons that are sure to expound upon his reputation and the narrative that when black men really do want a black women they always hurt them in the end.  My short term analysis is that black women are not the cause of the destructive demise of many black men!  I am confident that more than not black men who truly love black women would say that "she holds him down"!   
     
            Why does this matter to the sport sociologist in me?  Because any representation of the black athlete is important to a movement that offers an alternative perspective from the traditional demonization of the black male athlete.  It is rare that we get an opportunity to see what life is like off the field, so when we do, we hope there is an even balance between critism and empowerment.  The popularity of The Game offers a space for humanizing the black athlete, and I hope in seasons to come the writers can present a less stereotypical representation.  However, if an athlete can say that this show is" the closest to what sport is really like", I guess I have to accept maybe they are not myths at all.   

I would really like to know what you would add to my comments.  Please share your thoughts in the comments section.

6 comments:

  1. I watched The Game every week when it was on the WB. Once it switched to BET it seemed like things changed. It is a good show, but something that go on on the show are just over the top to me. I know things like that happen, but it just seemed like Melanie and Derwin always found a way to ruin their relationship, And honestly it became discouraging to me. No one on the show, actually, seemed to have a good relationship. Over time, the drama of the shows began to stress me out so I just stopped watching.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the intelligent commentary, Nameka. You raise some critical points. I've only watched "The Game" a handful of times or so. And while I generally like the show, I can hardly imagine how it'll work without Derwin and Melanie at the center. I guess I'll have to check it out next season just to see what the angle is.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Insightful commentary, Nameka. I enjoyed the read. I agree with the points you raised. I project the show won't be around more than another season, without the main characters, and considering the lackluster writing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I really appreciate the scholarly breakdown of the game. I was a little disappointed with the storyline this season and I am not sure why. It seemed as if some of the profile and stereotypes of the athletes and those who surround them were a little overblown. I am not sure if it was for the sake of comedy or because the show was trying to stay relevant. The Game is on to something, but the directors need to decide whether the comedy gets in the way of some better realities for athletes.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I used to consider myself the biggest fan of "The Game" when it first came out on the CW and tried to follow it while on BET but had to stop watching this season. It just no longer did anything for me and the points you raised above about some of the new and often demeaning writing made me decide I had enough. Great insight and analysis!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I really liked your assessment of the show- a very well written commentary! I agree with the other commentors, that the quality of the show became substantially lowered shortly after its transition to the BET network. Is this a writing/producing issue, or an "audience" issue (i.e. do the producers at BET think that in order to capture their audience, they have to "dumb down" the content?). I'm interested to know what made your football player friend say that this show was close to how it really is. Did he mean that the (actual football) game (and its politics) is depicted accurately, or the life (the relationships, etc)? Either way, you're right that there's lots more to worry about than academics. This article poses so many valuable questions regarding the lifestyles and concepts of what a "successful" black athlete looks like. I can't wait to read more of your posts.

    ReplyDelete